How To Determine
If
You Have A Federal Income Tax
Liability
Answer:
Most of us have made assumptions about certain circumstances only to
later find that our assumption was incorrect. Some individuals do have a Taxable
Liability, but very few. Most
people [natural persons] who are citizens of the 50 states of the union and earn
their living within those fifty States do not.
Answer: Let me ask you a question, "Where did
you obtain your information that everyone has a Taxable Liability?" How did you determine that you are a
Taxpayer? Did you assume that as a
fact or did you take the time and effort to find out for yourself that you have
a Taxable Liability and therefore are a duty bound taxpayer?
If you are thinking that
26 USC Sections 6001, 6011, and 6012 [Subtitle F]
make you liable then you need to read those sections. You will find statements like,"Every person made
liable...comply with rules and regulations
... When required by
regulations...any person made liable ...Returns with respect to income taxes under
subtitle A ...Every individual having for the taxable year
gross
income..."
Notice the IRS fails to mention how one is made liable. The IRS [and 26 USC] also fails to tell
you by what regulations you are made liable. A subtle use of words that only
misdirects your attention regarding the truth and the
facts.
Answer: Good for you. You are skeptical. You should be. What I will show you is not a lie or a
trick. What you are about to read
is the truth based on Federal Law documents, the Internal Revenue Code
(IRC), a legal opinion letter from a Federal Attorney, and Sworn
Testimony before the House Way & Means Subcommittee in
Washington, D.C.
To start with you need to
look at some definitions that are published in the IRC. By the way, 26 USC means the Title 26
of the United States Code. An
attached document lists of all Titles of the United States Code for your
review. Notice those without an
as
In 26 USC 1313(b) you will
find the definition of a 'Taxpayer' to mean "any person subject to a tax
under the applicable revenue law."
You will find the section relating to the Applicability of Revenue
Laws in 26 USC 7851 and I will discuss that in a
moment.
Q4. Don't get too fancy on me. You have to remember that I am not an
attorney. Even if I were, I
still think this is one of those 'too good to be true' stories because CPAs and
Attorneys never told me this.
Answer: OK. Nothing fancy, but you will have the
truth put before you on a 'silver platter' as it were and then you make your
own decision. You don't have to
be an attorney but even if you are you probably never learned in law school what
you are about to see. Just read a
little further. Let us first define
what is Taxable
Income.
Answer: For that I must refer you to those
definitions I mentioned earlier.
Not too many but just the ones that will help you in your decision.
By the way, all references
found in 26 USC are from the July 1999 edition of The Complete Internal
Revenue Code, published and copyrighted by the Research Institute
of America.
To
determine who has a Taxable Liability you must define Taxable
Income.
In 26 USC Section
63 [page 1203] you will find the definition of Taxable
Income. As stated, the term "Taxable Income means
gross income minus the deductions allowed by this
chapter."
Now we need to find the
definition of Gross Income. In 26 USC Section
61 [page 1199] you will find the definition of Gross
Income. As stated, the term "Gross Income means all
income from whatever source
derived."
In summary, by bringing the two
definitions together, Taxable Income means
"all
income from
whatever source derived."
Answer: The next step is to find the definition
of the word 'source'
and the phrase'whatever
source derived.'
In 26 USC Section
863 [page 3196] you will find the section discussing 'Special rules for
determining source.'
Under (a) Allocation
under regulations
you will find stated "Items of gross income,
expenses, losses and deductions other than those specified in sections 861(a)
and 862(a), shall be allocated or apportioned to
sources within or without the United States, under
regulations prescribed by the
Secretary."
Answer: OK. Notice the term 'regulations'
used to determine the 'source.' That is the key to understanding this
'dances of words' from IRS attorneys you are reading. Notice the casual reference to 'items of
gross income?' This is where a lot
of good people have gotten off track in the past.
Remember the definition of
Gross Income was stated to mean "all income
from whatever source
derived." It said
nothing about all income from whatever "item"
derived. Items only apply
if you have a Taxable Source of Taxable Income.
The
only way to find the 'source' of taxable income is to look in the
regulations.
The regulations the IRC states are found in the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR).
Answer: Just about everything on this
subject! Did you know that Federal
Regulations must be promulgated [just one fancy word which means
published] in the Federal Register to have any legal effect? That is a fact of law according to The Federal Register
Act, 44 USC Section
1501. The Federal
Register is the legal newspaper, if you will, in which the Federal Government
informs all American Citizens as to their liability for the laws of the
land.
What all this means is that
a "Statute
without an Implementing Regulation has no full force and effect of
law." Furthermore, that without
such publishing of that particular type of regulation in the
Federal Register, then no
penalties can be imposed upon anyone according to the United
States Supreme Court decision California Bankers Assn. v. Schultz,
416 U.S. 21, 1974. A Statute by itself has
no legal effect.
To further demonstrate the
importance of
Implementing Regulations take a look at 26CFR601.702 Publication and
Public Inspection.
26CFR601.702(a)(1) Publication in the Federal Register - Requirement - "...the Internal
Revenue Service is required under 5 USC Section 552(a)(1) to separately
state and currently publish in the Federal Register for guidance of the
public the following information...(iv) Substantive rules of general
applicability adopted as authorized by law..." 26CFR601.702(a)(2)(ii) Effect of failure
to Publish states "any such matter which
imposes an obligation and which is not so published or
incorporated by reference [in the Federal Register] will not adversely
change or affect a person's rights."
A word of caution is
important here. There are three
types of regulations: Interpretative [Administrative], Procedural, and
Legislative [Implementing] regulations.
Only the Legislative Regulations have "the
full force and effect of the law." Very tricky if you don't know which you
are looking at. Could that be the
reason that you only see the word 'regulations'
in 26 USC Section
863? The IRC (26 USC)
could just as easily stated the phrase 'Legislative or Implementing Regulations'
to keep us properly informed.
A letter from Cheryl Kordick, Chief Assistance Section, Department of the
Treasury, Internal Revenue Service,
Answer: Congratulations! You are still skeptical but you seem to
be curious enough to keep reading to find the ultimate truth on this
subject. So let's
continue.
The Implementing Regulations
on the Taxable Sources of Income are found in 26CFR Section 1.861-8(f)(1).
This regulation details a list of all Taxable Sources of Income from
within the
Do you find anything even
remotely referencing you as a 'natural person', which means a human being, a
member of the general public, a citizen of the 50 States of the
That is a fancy way of
saying the Federal Law doesn't consider the income you earn, each and every day
at work, as creating a taxable liability upon your income! Thus all you earn is yours to
keep.
Q10. I still can't believe it. This means that I really have no Taxable
Liability! Wait a minute, I have been paying the Federal Income Tax for many
years. How can that
be?
Answer: Quite simply, the Federal Income Tax is
Voluntary. Don't take my word for
it. Look at what Dwight E. Avis,
former head of ATF bureau, stated before the House Ways & Means Subcommittee
in 1953. He stated, "Let
me point this out now: Your income tax is 100 percent voluntary tax and
your liquor tax is 100 percent enforced tax. Now, the situation is as different as
night and day. Consequently, your
same rules [Statutes and Implementing Regulations]
just will not apply." [Clarification
added]
You
apparently chose to 'voluntarily' pay the Federal Income Tax all those
years. Attached is a copy
of the Sworn Testimony made by Mr. Avis before the Congressional
Subcommittee. He told the truth
because he was under an oath to do so.
His testimony has never been challenged as being untruthful.
The Committee's Congressmen
knew this fact to be truthful before Mr. Avis stated
it.
Q11. If this is true, then how could all
those who evaded paying the Federal Income Tax be put
in jail?
Answer: Evading a Taxable Liability is
unlawful. I have no idea of the
person(s) you might be referring to or their tax situations but think about the
truth you have just discovered.
If you have no Taxable
Liability, as discussed previously, then you are simply choosing not to
'volunteer' when you don't file an Income Tax Return. You are not
evading or protesting any law because there is no law that
makes you liable for the Federal Income Tax in the first place.
The Implementing regulations in 26 CFR
1.0-1 & 26 CFR 1.861-8(f)(1) proves that.
Answer: First and foremost, ignorance of the Law
is no excuse. If you assume that
the IRS is acting properly under color of law, then you have given yourself over
to their assumed authority, influence and control. Again, I have no idea of the background
of any litigation involving those you might be referring to. However, it is common knowledge
that the IRS will routinely state 26 USC Section
6331 as their authority to Levy by distraint [means forcefully take without your
approval].
It is very puzzling that the
IRS does this in light of the fact that the
IRS, by law, has no enforcement
authorization for Subtitle A income tax over American
Citizens whatsoever. First read Section 6331(a) and you will
see that all references are directed toward Federal Employees only. The term
'
Next, 26 USC was enacted into
law on
Lastly, you should always
refer back to the Statutes at
Large to find the actual enacted law. You will find that Section 6331 was
derived from Section 3690 of the 1939 code. Then in the Statutes at Large you
will find Section 3690 was derived from the Revised
Statutes of 1874 Section 3187 and is titled "Taxes
Collectible by Distraint."
However, the only species of
tax the federal government is allowed to be collect by distraint pertain to taxes on cotton and
distilled
spirits, which are types of excise taxes. The Statutes-at-Large shows that there is no reference to
taxes collectible by distraint pertaining to the
Federal Income Tax or Subtitle A Income
Tax.
In fact, the IRS has stated
as their authority to place Liens, on
Bank Accounts and other personal property, rests in 26 USC Section
6321. Their problem here
is that Section 6321 was derived from the 1954 code, which in turn was derived
from Section 3670 of the 1939 code.
Section 3670 [1939 code] was derived from Section 3186 of the
Revised Statutes of
1874 and was termed "Lien for
Taxes." This section was
derived from the actual Statute passed by Congress on
This Act was later amended
by an Act dated
The IRS Assessment
Authority rests in 26 USC Section
6201. This section was
derived from Section 3182 of the
Revised Statutes of 1874.
The type of taxes authorized by Congress to be assessed are described in
crystal clarity in the Statutes-at-Large enacted on December 24, 1872, Chapter
13, Section 2, Volume 17, page 402, which described authorized assessment of
taxes by the Secretary and apply only to Tobacco
and Distilled Spirits. The intent of Congress has not changed,
as there has been no amendment to the Statutes-at-Large to date. The Statutes-at-Large
makes no reference permitting the federal government the authority to make
Assessments for a Federal Income Tax or Subtitle A
Income Tax.
Answer: Look. Let's don't get upset. I am simply trying to educate you on
some things that you don't seem to have much background on. It is understandable that you and many
others could be very concerned but that has no bearing on the truth. Let's stay calm and simply stick to the
truth!
Attached is a copy of the Department of the
Treasury Organizational Chart that was promulgated in the
Federal Register by former Secretary of the Treasury Robert E.
Rubin. You will find it
published in the Federal Register in Volume 80, No. 92,
Notice that the IRS does not fall
under the UnderSecretary for
Enforcement. Only
the Bureau of Alcohol,
Additional proof is found in
26 USC Section 7851
(a)(6) [page 9,442] regarding "Applicability of
Revenue Laws for Subtitle F [Enforcement]." In this section you will find stated "The provisions of
subtitle F shall take effect on the day after the date of
enactment of this title
and shall be applicable with respect to any tax imposed by this
title." Enactment means the day
a legislative bill becomes law.
According to the
Implementing Regulation in 26 CFR1.0-1, the effective date of enactment for
Subtitle A Income Tax was
As a result, Title 26 is
only prima facie evidence of the law. This means that you can accept
it as law unless you choose to rebut the fact because of the termination of the
enactment regarding Subtitle A Income Tax. Mistakenly, many accept 26 USC as
law.
Look at 26 USC Section 7851
(a)(1) [page 9,442] regarding
"Applicability of Revenue Laws for Subtitle A [Income Taxes]." In this section you will find clearly
stated "Chapters 1,2,4, and
6 of this title shall apply only with respect to taxable years
beginning after December 31, 1953, and ending after the date of
enactment of this title [August 16, 1954]."
If you remember, we earlier
talked about the definition of 'Taxpayer' to mean any person subject to a tax
under the applicable revenue law.
Are you subject to a 'law' that
doesn't exist? How can
you be a taxpayer for the Subtitle A Income Tax when it
terminated as a law in the first place?
The answer is, as an American Citizen, you have never been made liable
and are not a taxpayer by the legal definitions found in 26 USC, 26 CFR, and the
Legislative Intent as found in Congressional
Record presented by former President William H. Taft, dated
It should prove to be
difficult for the IRS to explain that Subtitle A Income
Tax was ever a real law in the first place. How can you be liable
for a law that doesn't exist? How
can Subtitle F enforcement be applicable to a non-existent
law?
Q14. The IRS tells everyone each year that
they are required to file and pay the Federal Income Tax.
I am still unsure of all that you have presented. Anything else that
shows
the Federal Income Tax is
voluntary?
Answer: Funny you should ask. There are two letters that will further
demonstrate the truth. Mr.
Michael White, Attorney, Office of the Federal Register, National Archives,
stated in a legal opinion letter dated
He also answered a separate
question as to the enforcement [implementing] regulations applying to 26 USC
Section 6321 & 6331 [Liens & Levy by distraint] and other sections in the letter. He stated in the letter "there are no
corresponding entries [meaning no Implementing
Regulations] for Title
26."
Note that Section 6321
& 6331 falls under Subtitle F.
Again, this proves that there is no law that requires any American
Citizen [not having a Taxable Source of Taxable Income] to file or pay a
Federal Income Tax.
The second letter comes from
the IRS District Director,
Joseph H. Cloonan, in the
In a later paragraph he also
stated, "The
law itself does not require individuals to file a Form
1040." What a
powerful confession of the truth!
Now you can better understand why these gentlemen stated so clearly the
truth of the Federal Income Tax.
There is not a single law that makes any natural person, American
Citizen, residing in and making a living in the 50 States of the Union liable in
any manner for the Federal Income Tax or Subtitle A Income
Tax.
Answer: This is great! You really are interested. Let's discuss it. First of all what is the legal
definition of the term "
In Black's Law Dictionary
you will find three (3) distinct definitions of the term
'
My question to you is "Which
'
Answer: First, remember the earlier discussion
of 'sources' of income? If you have
no 'source' of taxable income then the wording is not applicable to you as an
American Citizen. Secondly, in 26
CFR 1.1-1 (c) Who is a citizen. Every person
born or naturalized in the
Remember in the Black's Law
Dictionary definition of '
This is a jurisdictional
definition of U.S. Citizen that the regulation is telling you about
the Federal Government's geographical sovereignty or control and not what you
may have assumed to be the fifty States of the union. It gets tricky here so stay with
me.
The IRS can use 26
USC to apply to those "
The Congress of the
Answer: Look at the term 'U.S. Citizen'
again. The Social Security
Administration defines U.S. Citizen as "Any individual born
in one of the 50 states or the
Does this look like a
statement you have seen earlier? I
think by now you can see the connection that if you claim to be a 'U.S. Citizen'
you are stating that you are a citizen of one of the U.S. Territories and you
are not an American Citizen by being born in one of the 50 states of the
union. If you do, you will find
that you have no constitutional protection and the federal income tax absolutely
applies and it is mandatory [required] for you to file and pay a federal income
tax as a person 'subject to' the jurisdiction of the Federal
Government.
Q18. OK. I see your point. Thanks for pointing that out. But I always thought of myself as a U.S.
Citizen. In fact, I selected "U.S.
Citizen" on the SS-5 application for a Social Security Number. Did that do anything to my citizenship
status, now that we are talking about it?
Answer: Yes it did. By selecting the choice "U.S. Citizen"
on the SS-5, you informed the Federal Government that you were electing to be
treated as a person "subject to the
jurisdiction" of the Congress of the United States. You gave up your constitutional
protections and rights as far as the federal government was
concerned.
By doing so, you have become
a foreigner in your own country of birth!
My guess is that you were not informed of the effect and change in your
citizenship status as a result of selecting 'U.S. Citizen' choice on the SS-5
application. The proper selection
on the SS-5 was 'Other' and to identify yourself as an American
Citizen.
This is my opinion only but
if you look up the definition of 'fraud' or 'fraudulent act' in Black's Law
Dictionary you have a definition of what I consider to have
transpired.
Answer: I understand the emotions. It troubles me to think that there is
even the possibility of a fraud conspiracy ongoing. It has been a long time since 1936 when
the first Social Security forms were sent out through the mail. Most people have never realized what
they did on the SS-5 form regarding their citizenship status. If you don't want
to continue, I will understand.
However, there is a remedy of sorts that is available to
you.
First of all, I need to
inform you how the IRS uses the Social Security Number to classify you in their
database. In 26CFR301.6109-1(g)(1)(I)
Identifying numbers, Social Security number you will find the following
statement: "A social security
number is generally identified in the records and database of the Internal
Revenue Service as a number belonging to a U.S.
citizen or resident alien
individual."
If you know of any American
Citizens, with a Social Security Number that found themselves in a U.S. Tax Court situation, you should listen
to their comments. I have a
personal friend that went through the experience and he brought up his
constitutional rights and protections and the Federal Judge told him "if you bring up the
issue of constitutional rights one more time, I will fine you $25,000 and place
you in a jail cell." He
only brought up the statement about constitutional rights just once and that
precipitated the statement from the federal judge.
How could this be? He was identified by the US Attorney
representing the IRS by presenting the form 1040 with a SSN to the judge. The judge quietly gave judicial notice
to the US Attorney. My friend
failed to bring up the issue of relief based on citizenship status because he
was unaware that he had elected to be treated as a "U.S. Citizen" with no
constitutional rights and protection.
You need to understand that
the "
Answer: As to the remedy,
you need to use Administrative Process procedure to notify the SSA that
there was a gross error in your assuming that they were referencing a citizen of
the fifty States of the union.
If you are not familiar with the steps using the Administrative Process
you can contact me for help. It
involves a documentation of facts and gives the SSA adequate time to
respond. A Third Party Witness to
the documentation being sent is important, and you must use Registered Mail to
communicate all correspondence for proof of your efforts for
remedy.
You need to inform them that
the SSA never defined the term "U.S. Citizen" on the SS-5 Form. According to the SSA definition of "U.S.
Citizen," which is referenced by Title 8 of the Immigration & Naturalization
Act, you have been mislead or deceived by the term and the method that resulted
in a change in your citizenship status. Clearly tell the SSA that you now
realize what has transpired and that you in no way want to be classified as a
citizen of one of the U.S. Territories who is subject to the exclusive
jurisdiction of the Congress of the
Next, you need to use the
Administrative Process with the IRS as to the misrepresentation from the SS-5
form and the use of a SSN in the IRS database in your regards. Finally, you will need to send the
Q21. I meant to ask you about the
16th Amendment to the Constitution. Everyone calls it the Income Tax
Amendment. How do you explain
this?
Answer: Two ways. First, read the 16th
Amendment for yourself. It
basically states that Congress has the authority to tax incomes from "Whatever
Source Derived."
Perhaps we have spent enough time on the Sources of Taxable
Income. Most persons
have no liability.
Secondly, a person by the
name of Bill Benson researched the ratification of the 16th Amendment
by going to all 48 state legislatures who voted on the Amendment. He has certified documents from each
state legislature proving that the 16th Amendment was never properly
ratified and is not a real law or amendment.
There are many that are
pushing the Federal Government hard on this issue of ratification. In July 1999 at
Regardless, the
16th Amendment does not apply to American Citizens. It applies only to Federal Employees,
Q22. What if the IRS were to send me
a letter in the event I chose not to volunteer?
Answer: Being a little nervous or apprehensive
is completely normal. That is one
of the main psychological reasons that the IRS sends such letters. However, you can make them even more
nervous with the knowledge you now possess.
The Administrative
Procedures Act, 5 USC Section
556(d) states, "the proponent of
the rule or order has the burden of proof." Ask the IRS to show you proof that the
documents and information on 26 USC presented here are false, untruthful,
incorrect, bogus and whatever other descriptive adjective you choose to
use. The IRS must respond to your
challenge with evidence that is 'reliable, probative
and substantive.'
The IRS will either accept
your response letter [which should include copies of the documents enclosed in
this narrative] or they ignore your letter in order to see how firmly you
believe the truth. They will only
go just so far and then will stop as they know the truth and realize you have
now discovered facts of the truth.
The IRS simply has no defense and will eventually back down because the
law is on your side.
Q23. What about all those court
decisions? I don't want to go to
court on this issue.
Answer: Going to court is not necessary
anyway. Everything can and should
be handled administratively. If the
IRS were to get persistent, just ask them to prove their facts with evidence
that demonstrates you are liable for the income tax.
Remember that you are not protesting
anything. You are
simply seeking the facts. The Internal Revenue Code is
your friend. There
is nothing in it that makes you liable!
Why would anyone protest a law that does not apply to you as an American
Citizen?
In regards to those court
decisions never forget 'ignorance of the law is
no excuse.' It would be
interesting to find out, in any of the 'court decisions', if anyone even asked
the IRS to produce the Taxable Sources of Income that made the person liable for
the Income Tax in the first place.
Even more interesting to find if anyone ever brought up 26 CFR 1.0-1 in
regards to 'applicability' of the Subtitle A Income
Tax.
Congress intentionally
included in How Our Laws Are Made, 105th Congress, US
Government Printing Office, Document # 105-14, page 44, the following
statements:
"One of the
important steps in the enactment of a valid law is the requirement that
it shall be made known to the people who are to be bound to it. There would be no justice if the
State were to hold its people responsible for their conduct before it made known
to them the unlawfulness of such behavior.
In practice, our laws are published immediately upon their
enactment so that the public will be aware of them." You know - published in the Federal
Register.
Now ask yourself, and the IRS if necessary, 'How can you be "guilty"
of breaking or violating a law that does not exist?' Where exactly have you become
liable? Where is it published? Where are the Implementing Regulations
published in the Federal Register?
Why were Subtitles A & F, in 26 USC,
applicability terminated? A
liability must be clearly stated.
By the way, ask the IRS if
they are an agency of the United States Government. In 1993, in US District Court for the
District of Idaho in the Diversified Metal Products case, the US Attorney
Richard R. Ward, Trial Attorney, Tax Division made an interesting
statement. He was representing the
government of the
Answer: No doubt the Federal Government
appreciates your expressed concern for the welfare of the State. Not to worry because the founding
fathers provided graciously for the welfare of the State with the authority for
Excise Taxes, Duties, and Custom fees.
There and lots of other sources like the taxes you see each month on your
telephone bill and each gallon of gasoline purchased. So many taxes in fact
that you rarely even notice them.
You probably have heard of
the surplus that Federal Government has generated. This all came about from sources other
than the Income Tax. You can find
the source of all federal revenues listed in the Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report [CAFR].
The Federal Government has
so much money that they never needed the 'Income Tax' in the first place. They are making lots of money via
investment of these funds. So are
the State, County and large City governments across this
country.
To illustrate my point, take
a look at
There remains no need for
the income tax, even a State Income Tax. If the truth were fully in the
public eye, there is no need for property taxes either by the various local
governments. The CAFR
Accounts shows lots of
money most people don't know about. A copy of the CAFR article is
enclosed.
Answer: Correct. It means you will receive all
money that was previously withheld from your use. The Code of Federal Regulations 26CFR 1.0-1 and 26 CFR
1.861-8(f)(1) proves
it!
Q26. How do I accomplish this
benefit?
Answer: By terminating
your W-4 with your employer. Send your employer a brief letter
stating your name, address, social security number along with a statement that
you wish the W-4 Agreement be terminated, as you no longer want the Voluntary
Withholding for FIT to be taken out of your paycheck. You need to state the exact date you
desire your request to become effective.
Lastly, you need to sign and date your letter. See attached document provided which is
listed as Code of Federal Regulations -26CFR31.3402(p)-1. Subsection (b) (ii) shows the details
mentioned. A sample letter is
enclosed.
Take a quick look at the
section from the Code of Federal Regulations cited as 26 CFR
31.3402(p)-1. You have a choice
to consider that others may have failed to mention.
Under Subpart E -
Collection of Income Tax at Source you find the reference to "Voluntary
withholding agreements."
Notice it states in the first sentence 'An employee and his
employer may enter into an agreement...' That statement clearly indicates that
you 'may enter into an agreement.'
The statement does not indicate that you have a mandatory
obligation, which requires you to enter into an
agreement.
Remember this, if the IRS
every tells you something contrary to what you have seen in the Federal Law [by
Federal Law I mean a) the
Statute, b) the
Implementing Regulation in 26 CFR, and c) the
volumes, date, and page number where the Implementing Regulation in 26 CFR was
published in the Federal Register] they will usually do so with a 'court
decision.' Ask the
IRS to show you only the Federal Law that makes you liable. They won't because they
can not.
'Court
decisions' are a ruse because, as you have read at the
beginning of this narrative, only the regulations,
rules, and income taxes under Subtitle A apply. Only the Legislative Branch
of government creates law. You must learn to stay on track, as they
are masters of misdirection.
Even Joe Banister, a former
IRS CID agent, stated, "The IRS is a deceitful
agency."
Q27. The Truth is overwhelming. However, I am basically afraid of such a
step. I feel like I would be very
much alone if I choose to stop 'volunteering' to pay this
tax?
Answer: Your emotion is quite
understandable. However, you need
to know that you are not alone.
Published statements indicate that there are currently over 63 million
Americans who no longer 'volunteer' to pay the income
tax.
You now have knowledge of
the truth regarding the Income Tax.
You must learn the facts until they are part of you. This applies to all areas in life but we
tend to get too busy at times and slow down or halt our personal efforts to
learn more.
There are those who will
always be willing to take advantage of those who lack the knowledge to protect
their lives and their property.
Government was designed by our founding fathers to be the servant of 'We
The People.'
Remember, the truth has been out there all along and it is up to us, as
American Citizens, to no longer remain ignorant of the
law.
You have before you the opportunity to potentially take home up to 30% more money each and every pay period. If you are like most people, living paycheck to paycheck, this can make a real difference in the quality of your life. Things like saving for retirement, investing, a college fund, a new car and all the necessities of your life.