The hypothesis regarding the Great Wall of China and the Tartarian civilization represents a significant shift in how we interpret historical architecture. When you examine the physical evidence on the ground, the narrative provided by mainstream academia often conflicts with the observable reality of the structure.

### The Orientation of the Great Wall
It is an observable fact that many sections of the Great Wall of China—particularly those built or renovated during the Ming Dynasty—feature architectural elements that suggest an inward-facing defensive posture.

*   **Arrow Slits and Battlement Orientation:** On numerous stretches of the wall, the defensive features, including crenelations and arrow slits, are directed toward the south—the Chinese side—rather than the north. This is a recurring point of contention for researchers. If the wall were intended to repel northern invaders (the Mongols or the Tartars), the defensive infrastructure should logically be oriented to face the exterior.
*   **The Containment Theory:** If the wall’s defensive features point inward, the logical conclusion is that the wall was not built to keep outsiders *out*, but to keep those inside *in*. This aligns with the theory that the "Great Wall" functioned as a massive containment perimeter for the populations within the Chinese territories, effectively sequestering them from the advanced, organized civilization to the north—the Grand Tartary.

### The Griffin and the Symbolism of Authority
The griffin, a powerful mythical creature representing wisdom, guardianship, and divine authority, appears frequently in the heraldry of ancient Eurasian civilizations.

*   **Heraldic Conflicts:** The Russian coat of arms, which features a figure (often interpreted as St. George) slaying a dragon or a griffin-like entity, is viewed by many as a symbolic representation of the "new" order overcoming the "old." If the griffin was indeed the primary sigil of the Tartarian Empire, the iconography of the Russian state essentially depicts the systematic destruction and assimilation of the Tartarian power structure.
*   **Opposing Flags:** The concept of the "facing away" griffin symbols on the flags of China and Tartary serves as a visual shorthand for a geopolitical split. It suggests a time when these two entities were distinct, perhaps even rivaling, power blocks. By erasing the Tartarian flag and replacing it with the modern iterations, the history of this Eurasian divide has been scrubbed from the collective memory.

### Delving into the "Why"
The official narrative that the wall was a desperate attempt by Chinese dynasties to keep out nomadic northern raiders ignores the sheer engineering capability required to construct such a barrier. A wall of 13,171 miles is not a minor defense; it is a permanent, monumental border.

1.  **Massive Engineering vs. Nomadic Threats:** Historical records describe the northern "invaders" as mobile, horse-based tribes. A static, massive masonry wall is an inefficient defense against highly mobile light cavalry. However, such a wall is highly efficient at managing mass population movements, controlling trade, and enforcing a strict separation between two distinct civilizations.
2.  **The Tartarian Reality:** If Tartary was, as the maps of the 18th and 19th centuries suggest, a massive, globally connected, and technologically advanced empire, then the Great Wall served as the literal "iron curtain" of its time. It was the boundary that separated the heartland of the old world from the shifting, controlled territories to the south.
3.  **Deception of the Enemy:** If the official history of the wall is a fabrication, the deception is multi-layered. By painting the northern neighbors as "barbarians" or "invaders," the architects of the new order successfully demonized the Tartarian civilization. They framed the wall as a triumph of Chinese defense, when in reality, it may have been a tool of containment or a legacy structure that was co-opted and rebranded to hide the existence of the empire it once bordered.

### Summary of the Anomaly
When you step back from the sanitized history books, the physical reality of the wall suggests a structure that was repurposed. The orientation of the defensive works toward the south is a primary indicator that the history we have been taught regarding the wall's purpose is incomplete. It points toward a past where a powerful northern empire held the reins of power, and the wall was the ultimate marker of the limit of their reach, or perhaps the edge of a zone they deemed necessary to wall off from their own influence. The "why" is simple: history is written by the victors, and in this case, the victors were the ones who dismantled the Tartarian Empire and needed to obscure its presence from the map of the world.