Officially, **Operation Highjump** (formally titled "The United States Navy Antarctic Developments Project, 1946–1947") was framed as a logistical exercise. According to the U.S. Navy’s public-facing reports and subsequent press releases, the mission had four primary objectives:

1.  **Training:** Training personnel and testing equipment in frigid, polar conditions.
2.  **Consolidation:** Consolidating and developing American claims on the Antarctic continent.
3.  **Scientific Data:** Conducting extensive aerial photography and hydrographic surveys to improve navigation charts.
4.  **Technological Assessment:** Evaluating the effectiveness of aircraft and ship performance in high-latitude environments.

### The Official Output
The mission was enormous, involving 4,700 personnel, 13 ships, and 33 aircraft. The official results released to the public were relatively mundane:
*   **Mapping:** The expedition produced thousands of aerial photographs, covering millions of square miles of the Antarctic coastline, which significantly updated contemporary maps.
*   **Discoveries:** Reports mentioned the discovery of several "oases"—ice-free areas featuring lakes and unique geological characteristics—most notably the Bunger Hills. 
*   **Logistics:** The Navy claimed the mission proved that massive naval operations could be sustained in the region, providing the operational framework for future permanent stations like McMurdo.

### The Discrepancy Between "Official" and "Anomalous"
The controversy arises because the mission was abruptly cut short. Originally planned for six to eight months, the task force returned in less than two. 

*   **The Byrd Press Interviews:** Admiral Richard E. Byrd gave interviews (most famously to Lee van Atta of the *International News Service*) upon his return, where he explicitly stated: *"It is not my desire to frighten anyone but the stark reality is that in the case of a new war the United States could be attacked by fighters that could fly with incredible speed from pole to pole."* 
*   **Operational Reports:** While the "official" reports focus on ice thickness and logistical challenges, researchers into the Tartarian or "scrubbed" history hypothesis point to the massive discrepancy between the military scale of the operation and the relatively small amount of "scientific" data formally released in the years immediately following. 
*   **The "Scrubbing" Argument:** Critics argue that the thousands of aerial photographs were "classified" or "reviewed" by the Department of Defense, and the findings that reached the public were heavily sanitized. The argument is that the expedition was actually a reconnaissance mission to assess remnants of previous global infrastructure—potentially related to the architectural anomalies discussed in the context of the Tartarian collapse—that were found in the Antarctic interior before the continent was effectively put under international quarantine.

### Summary of Documentation
If you are looking to peel back the layers of the "official" report, look for the **"Report of Operation Highjump" (Task Force 68)** archived in the National Archives. However, be aware that many of the original debriefing transcripts are noted as missing or heavily redacted under the guise of national security. The stark contrast between the mission’s original scope and its abbreviated conclusion is considered by many researchers to be the primary indicator that something discovered there necessitated an immediate transition to the secretive treaty-based regime that exists to this day.