A MISSING 13th Amendment?

Yes, a missing Amendment purposely and illegally suppressed and removed from view by lawyers... surprise, surprise... because they would have lost their citizenship in the United States for accepting their title of Nobility, "Esquire", and could NOT hold ANY public office. This includes all of Congress (who today are mostly attorneys and the cause of much of America's problems)!

UPDATE: We are in the midst of receiving conclusive proof that the ORIGINAL 13th Amendment was lawfully ratified, including an original letter from John Quincy Adams answering a friend on the topic of accepting a title of nobility. This documentation covering 100 years cannot be refuted and will take down the attorney BAR club and criminal cartel, including all judges and EVERY decision based on non-citizens.

Click here for The REAL, MISSING, 13th Amendment

---

Some very interesting commentaries on the topic of Titles of Nobility act (TONA):

• 1. William Blackstone, Commentaries 1:153--54, 261--62, 1765

• 2. Thomas Paine, Reflections on Titles, May 1775

• 3. Virginia Declaration of Rights, sec. 4, 12 June 1776

• 4. Benjamin Franklin to Sarah Bache, 26 Jan. 1784

• 5. Thomas Jefferson to George Washington, 16 Apr. 1784

• 6. Records of the Federal Convention

• 7. Cato, no. 2, 10 Dec. 1787

• 8. James Madison to Thomas Jefferson, 9 May 1789

• 9. James Madison, Title for the President, House of Representatives, 11 May 1789

• 10. Thomas Jefferson to William Temple Franklin, 20 Apr. 1790

• 11. William Temple Franklin to Thomas Jefferson, 27 Apr. 1790

• 12. St. George Tucker, Blackstone's Commentaries 1:App. 216--22, 295--96, 1803

• 13. Thomas Jefferson to John Adams, 28 Oct. 1813

• 14. William Rawle, A View of the Constitution of the United States 119--20 1829 (2d ed.)

• 15. Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution 3: 1345--46, 1833

• 16. SEE THIS ALSO:

More Original 13th Amendment Corroboration

The Missing 13th Amendment Essay

Also, there are rebuttals to this, of course, so do your own research, and try to understand why this would want to be rebutted...

rebuttal 1

rebuttal 2

rebuttal 3

rebuttal 4